CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN
PRINCE VASYL-KOSTIANTYN OSTROZKYI
AND KRYSHTOF RADZIWILL AS A SOURCE
Petro KULAKOVSKY
Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor,
The National University of Ostroh Academy
(Ukraine, Ostroh), This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6310-717X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/ul2024.07.044
Abstract
The article analyzes the correspondence of Kyiv voivode V.- K. Ostrozkyi to his son-in-law, an influential Lithuanian politician Kryštof Radziwill. This is almost the only relatively complete complex of the prince's correspondence in Ostroh, which, given the trusting relationship between both participants of the correspondence, allows us to reconstruct his inner world. As one might suspect, he significantly contradicted Ostroh's public persona. For the prince, the correct ("old") "world" remained in the past, in the times before the Union of Lublin from the year 1569. Innovations were perceived by Vasyl-Kostiantyn as a challenge to this world, which violated its traditional foundations and consisted of an attack on regionalism, a reduction in the political role of princes, and attempts to change the confessional picture of the newly created state. The prince believed that the policy of the Rzeczpospolita's leadership toward the Moscow state was ill-conceived. Ostrozkyi argued that constant wars with the eastern neighbor reduced the overall potential of Christian civilization in its confrontation with Islamic civilization, especially with the country which at that time embodied its offensive in Europe, the Ottoman Empire. Ostrozkyi appealed to Radziwill with the expectation of finding support in the confrontation with Jan Zajmoyskyi, an extremely influential crown chancellor and hetman in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. It is no coincidence that the Kyiv voivode focused on issues that might have been of interest to the Lithuanian magnate. In particular, these interests included: the attempts of the crown elite, led by J. Zamoyskyi to ignore the interests of the Lithuanian and Ruthenian nobility, unwillingness to pay due attention to defense issues, insufficient allocation of funds for the repair and construction of castle fortifications. Gradually, the correspondence reflects the problem of interfaith confrontation, which was the result of the growth of counter-reformation processes from the beginning of Sigismund III's rule in the Polish-Lithuanian state. Their main emphasis in Europe was on Protestantism (K. Radziwill represented Calvinism), but in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, as a result of the Union of Brest in 1596, the Counter-Reformation also acquired anti-Orthodox content. In general, the correspondence of Prince V.-K. Ostrozkyi is a unique source that allows us to reconstruct the main features of the identity of an influential princely stratum, which was significantly influenced by the transformation processes in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth in the second half of the sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries.
Keywords:
correspondence, Vasyl-Kostiantyn Ostrozkyi, Kryshtof Radziwill, "old world", innovations.
Archiv
Manuscript Institute of the V. Vernadskyi National Library of Ukraine
The Central Archive of Ancient Documents in Warshaw
References
1. Bondar, O., Zhyrokhov, M. (2012). Dvanadtsiat bytv za Chernihiv. Chernihiv: Kniazhyi hrad. [in Ukrainian].
2. Golubev, S. (1883). Kievskiy mitropolit Petr Mogila i ego spodvizhniki (opyit istoricheskogo issledovaniya). Kiev: Tipografiya G. T. Korchak-Novitskogo. T. 1. Prilozheniya: Materialyi dlya istorii zapadno-russkoy tserkvi. [in Russian].
3. Gruneveg M. (o. Ventseslav): duhovnik Marinyi Mnishek (2013). Zapiski o torgovoy poezdke v Moskvu v 1584–1585 gg. / Sost. A. L. Horoshkevich. Moskva: Pamyatniki istoricheskoy myisli. [in Russian].
4. Grześkowiak–Krwawicz, A. (2012). Rzeczpospolita – pojęcie i idea w dyskursie politycznym Rzeczypospolitej Obojga Narodow. Rekonesans. Odrodzenie i Reformacja w Polsce, vol. LVI, 5–35. [in Polish].
5. Jarczykowa, M. (2019). Korespondencja i literatura okolicznościowa w kręgu magnaterii Wielkiego Księstwa Litewskiego. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego. [in Polish].
6. Kempa, T. (1997). Konstanty Wasyl Ostrogski (ok. 1524/1525–1608) wojewoda kijowski i marszałek ziemi wołyńskiej. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika. [in Polish].
7. Kempa, T. (2001). Magnateria ruska wobec unii lubelskiej (1569). Białoruskie Zeszyty Historyczne, т. 16, 5–25. [in Polish].
8. Krykun, M., Piddubniak, O. (Comp.) (2008). Dokumenty Bratslavskoho voievodstva 1566–1606 rokiv. Lviv: Naukove tovarystvo imeni Shevchenka. [in Ukrainian].
9. Krykun, M. (2012). Zemski uriady na ukrainskykh zemliakh u XV–XVIII stolittiakh. Krykun M. Voievodstva Pravoberezhnoi Ukrainy u XV–XVIII stolittiakh. Statti i materialy. Lviv: Vydavnytstvo Lvivskoi politekhniky, 589–664. [in Ukrainian].
10. Krom, M. M. (1994). «Starina» kak kategoriya srednevekovogo mentaliteta: po materialam velikoho knyazhestva Litovskogo 14 – nach. 17 vv. Mediaevalia Ucrainica, t. 3, 68–85. [in Russian].
11. Kulish, P. (1874). Istoriya vossoedineniya Rusi. Sankt-Peterburg. T. 2: Ot nachala stoletney kazatsko-shlyahetskoy voynyi do vosstanovleniya v Kieve pravoslavnoy ierarhii, v 1620 godu. [in Russian].
12. Opaliński, E. (1995). Kultura polityczna szlachty polskiej w latach 1587–1652. System parlamentarny a spoleczeństwo obywatelskie. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe. [in Polish].
13. Ulianovskyi, V. (2012). Kniaz Vasyl-Kostiantyn Ostrozkyi: istorychnyi portret u halerei predkiv ta nashchadkiv. Kyiv: Vydavnychyi dim «Prostir». [in Ukrainian].
14. Yakovenko, N. (2002). Paralelnyi svit. Doslidzhennia z istorii uiavlen ta idei v Ukraini XVI–XVII st. Kyiv: Krytyka. [in Ukrainian].